Truth, rules, hoverflies, and the Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox
Philosophical Review 99 (3):323-53 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Language Naturalism Rule Truth Kripke, S Putnam, H | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGeorge Rudebusch (1986). Hoffman on Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophical Research Archives 12:177-182.
Saul A. Kripke (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Harvard University Press.
Carl Ginet (1992). The Dispositionalist Solution to Wittgenstein's Problem About Understanding a Rule: Answering Kripke's Objection. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):53-73.
Ronald Suter (1986). Saul Wittgenstein's Skeptical Paradox. Philosophical Research Archives 12:183-193.
John A. Humphrey (1996). Kripke's Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language: The Same Old Story? Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
Patricia H. Werhane (1987). Some Paradoxes in Kripke's Interpretation of Wittgenstein. Synthese 73 (2):253 - 273.
Adam M. Croom (2010). Wittgenstein, Kripke, and the Rule Following Paradox. Dialogue 52 (3):103-109.
Scott Soames (1998). Facts, Truth Conditions, and the Skeptical Solution to the Rule-Following Paradox. Philosophical Perspectives 12 (S12):313-48.
Paul A. Boghossian (1989). The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind 98 (392):507-49.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads171 ( #1,938 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #7,578 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
