Using representations of space to study early modern physical science: An example of philosophy in the service of history
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Most historians of science eagerly acknowledge that the early modern period witnessed a shift from a prevailing Aristotelian, spherical, centered conception of space to a prevailing Cartesian, rectilinear, oriented spatial framework. Indeed, this shift underlay many of the important advances for which the period is celebrated. However, historians have failed to engage the general conceptual shift, focusing instead on the particular explanatory developments that resulted. This historical lacuna can be attributed to a historiographical problem: the lack of an adequate unit of analysis by which to investigate the conceptual change. Here, a philosophical argument is made for representations of space as an appropriate category of historical investigation, and methods of textual interrogation are suggested to this end. Finally, two examples, taken from Aristotle and Newton, demonstrate the feasibility and importance of this project.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gideon Freudenthal (2005). The Hessen-Grossman Thesis: An Attempt at Rehabilitation. Perspectives on Science 13 (2):166-193.
Max Jammer (1993). Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics. Dover Publications.
Max Jammer (1969). Concepts of Space. Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.
Donald Rutherford (ed.) (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Edward Grant (1981). Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum From the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.) (2008). Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume IV. OUP Oxford.
Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.) (2010). Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume V. OUP Oxford.
Yoko Arisaka (1996). Spatiality Temporality and the Probelm of Foundation in Being and Time. Philosophy Today 40 (1):36-46.
Jon Miller & Brad Inwood (eds.) (2003). Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #133,580 of 1,100,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,144 of 1,100,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?