W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):13-29 (2013)
This paper offers a critique of sustainability reporting and, in particular, a critique of the modern disconnect between the practice of sustainability reporting and what we consider to be the urgent issue of our era: sustaining the life-supporting ecological systems on which humanity and other species depend. Tracing the history of such reporting developments, we identify and isolate the concept of the ‘triple bottom line’ (TBL) as a core and dominant idea that continues to pervade business reporting, and business engagement with sustainability. Incorporating an entity’s economic, environmental and social performance indicators into its management and reporting processes, we argue, has become synonymous with corporate sustainability; in the process, concern for ecology has become sidelined. Moreover, this process has become reinforced and institutionalised through SustainAbility’s biennial benchmarking reports, KPMG’s triennial surveys of practice, initiatives by the accountancy profession and, particularly, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)’s sustainability reporting guidelines. We argue that the TBL and the GRI are insufficient conditions for organizations contributing to the sustaining of the Earth’s ecology. Paradoxically, they may reinforce business-as-usual and greater levels of un-sustainability
|Keywords||Triple bottom line Global Reporting Initiative Corporate sustainability reporting Ecological sustainability Archival analysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Reggy Hooghiemstra (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):55 - 68.
William E. Odum (1982). Environmental Degradation and the Tyranny of Small Decisions. BioScience 32 (9):728-729.
Bertrand Russell (1912/2004). The Problems of Philosophy. Barnes & Noble Books.
Lee M. Talbot (1980). World Conservation Strategy: Correction. BioScience 30 (1):4-4.
Citations of this work BETA
Hoje Jo & Maretno Harjoto (2015). Legal Vs. Normative CSR: Differential Impact on Analyst Dispersion, Stock Return Volatility, Cost of Capital, and Firm Value. Journal of Business Ethics 128 (1):1-20.
Similar books and articles
Chris MacDonald (2004). Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262.
Jan Tullberg (2012). Triple Bottom Line – a Vaulting Ambition? Business Ethics 21 (3):310-324.
Kaushik Sridhar (2012). Is the Triple Bottom Line a Restrictive Framework for Non-Financial Reporting? Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):89 - 121.
Alan Willis (2003). The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):233 - 237.
Mollie Painter-Morland (2006). Triple Bottom-Line Reporting as Social Grammar: Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Codes of Conduct. Business Ethics 15 (4):352–364.
Evonne Miller, Laurie Buys & Jennifer Summerville (2007). Quantifying the Social Dimension of Triple Bottom Line: Development of a Framework and Indicators to Assess the Social Impact of Organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):223-237.
Anne Toppinen & Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki (2013). Global Reporting Initiative and Social Impact in Managing Corporate Responsibility: A Case Study of Three Multinationals in the Forest Industry. Business Ethics 22 (1):202-217.
Matias Laine, Hannele Mäkelä, Salme Näsi & Oana Apostol (2007). The Sustainability Reporting of Municipalities. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:318-323.
Giacomo Manetti & Simone Toccafondi (2012). The Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability Reporting Assurance. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):363-377.
Lizet Quaak, Theo Aalbers & John Goedee (2007). Transparency of Corporate Social Responsibility in Dutch Breweries. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3):293 - 308.
Moses L. Pava (2007). A Response to “Getting to the Bottom of 'Triple Bottom Line'”. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):105-110.
Maria Rosa Rovira Val, Anna Zinenko & Ivan Montiel (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility Instruments and the New ISO 26000. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:316-326.
Timo W. M. van den Brink & Frans van der Woerd (2004). Industry Specific Sustainability Benchmarks: An ECSF Pilot Bridging Corporate Sustainability with Social Responsible Investments. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):187-203.
Timo W. M. Van Den Brink & Frans van Der Woerd (2004). Industry Specific Sustainability Benchmarks: An ECSF Pilot Bridging Corporate Sustainability with Social Responsible Investments. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):187 - 203.
David Nitkin & Leonard J. Brooks (1998). Sustainability Auditing and Reporting: The Canadian Experience. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1499-1507.
Added to index2012-11-18
Total downloads7 ( #280,438 of 1,707,759 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #352,633 of 1,707,759 )
How can I increase my downloads?