Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):635–641 (2004)
|Abstract||Several philosophers offer explanations of linguistic vagueness by appealing to the referential context-dependence of vague terms. Timothy Williamson argues pre-emptively that any such approach must fail, on the grounds that context-dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for vagueness. He supports this claim, in turn, by example. This paper argues that his examples fail to show that context-dependence is either unnecessary or insufficient for vagueness, and hence that he has failed by his own lights to show that it cannot explain vagueness|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dan López de Sa (2006). Is 'Everything' Precise? Dialectica 60 (4):397–409.
Susanne Bobzien (2012). If It's Clear, Then It's Clear That It's Clear, or is It? Higher-Order Vagueness and the S4 Axiom. In B. Morison K. Ierodiakonou (ed.), Episteme, etc. OUP UK.
Kristie Miller (2006). Vagueness, Persistence and Indeterminate Identity. Erkenntnis 64 (2):223 - 230.
Timothy Williamson (1999). On the Structure of Higher-Order Vagueness. Mind 108 (429):127-143.
Timothy Williamson (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Stewart Shapiro (2006/2008). Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press.
Y. Greenberg (2007). Exceptions to Generics: Where Vagueness, Context Dependence and Modality Interact. Journal of Semantics 24 (2):131-167.
Timothy Williamson (2002). Horgan on Vagueness. Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):273-285.
Trenton Merricks (2001). Varieties of Vagueness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):145-157.
Rosanna Keefe (2007). Vagueness Without Context Change. Mind 116 (462):275-292.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,650 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?