Who or What Decides for Derrida: A Catastrophic Theory of Decision

In Dominiek Hoens, Sigi Jottkandt & Gert Buelens (eds.), The Catastrophic Imperative: Subjectivity, Time and Memory in Contemporary Thought. Palgrave-Macmillan (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter addresses the question: Who or what decides? How, for Derrida, does a bona fide decision take place? Decision is analyzed in many places in Derrida's work, particularly in the late work. The chapter focuses “micrologically” on what seems to be Derrida's fullest and most elaborate expression of what he means by “decision.” This is an intricate sequence in “Force of Law”. It begins with an apparently peripheral subquestion. Can a decision be a catastrophe? If so, in what sense?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The events of morality and forgiveness: From Kant to Derrida.Christian Lotz - 2006 - Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):255-273.
Derrida enisled.J. Hillis Miller - 2007 - In William John Thomas Mitchell & Arnold Ira Davidson (eds.), The Late Derrida. University of Chicago Press. pp. 248-276.
For Derrida.Joseph Hillis Miller - 2009 - New York: Fordham University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-20

Downloads
14 (#930,021)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joan Miller
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references