|Abstract||The Swamping Problem is one of the standard objections to reliabilism. If one assumes, as reliabilism does, that truth is the only non instrumental epistemic value, then the worry is that the additional value of knowledge over true belief cannot be adequately explained, for reliability only has instrumental value relative to the non instrumental value of truth. Goldman and Olsson reply to this objection that reliabilist knowledge raises the objective probability of future true beliefs and is thus more valuable than mere true belief. I argue against their proposed solution to the Swamping Problem that the conditional probability of future true beliefs given knowledge is not clearly higher than given mere true belief.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Erik J. Olsson & Martin L. Jönsson (2011). Kinds of Learning and the Likelihood of Future True Beliefs: Reply to Jäger on Reliabilism and the Value Problem. Theoria 77 (3):214-222.
Justin P. McBrayer (2007). Process Reliabilism, Virtue Reliabilism, and the Value of Knowledge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):289-302.
Markus Werning (2009). The Evolutionary and Social Preference for Knowledge: How to Solve Meno's Problem Within Reliabilism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):137-156.
Christoph Jäger (2011). Reliability and Future True Belief: Reply to Olsson and Jönsson. Theoria 77 (3):223-237.
Wayne Davis & Christoph Jäger (2012). Reliabilism and the Extra Value of Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 157 (1):93-105.
Campbell Brown (2012). The Utility of Knowledge. Erkenntnis 77 (2):155-65.
Christoph Jäger (2011). Process Reliabilism and the Value Problem. Theoria 77 (3):201-213.
Erik J. Olsson (2011). Reply to Kvanvig on the Swamping Problem. Social Epistemology 25 (2):173 - 182.
Erik J. Olsson (2009). In Defense of the Conditional Probability Solution to the Swamping Problem. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):93-114.
Joachim Horvath (2009). Why the Conditional Probability Solution to the Swamping Problem Fails. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):115-120.
Added to index2009-10-09
Total downloads34 ( #40,555 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,023 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?