David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):353-357 (2003)
: In response to the preceding commentary by Jerry Menikoff in this issue of the Journal , the authors argue that Fried's central concern is not that randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are conducted without consent, but rather that various aspects of the design and conduct of RCTs are in tension with physicians' duties of personal care to their patients. Although Fried does argue that the existence of equipoise cannot justify failure to obtain consent from research subjects, informed consent by itself does not supplant ill subjects' rights to personalized judgment and care embodied in Fried's equipoise
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller (2005). A Normative Justification for Distinguishing the Ethics of Clinical Research From the Ethics of Medical Care. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 33 (Fall 2005):566-74.
Christine Czoli, Michael Silva, Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Lori Agincourt-Canning, Christy Simpson, Katherine Boydell, Natalie Rashkovan & Sharon Vanin (2011). Accountability and Pediatric Physician-Researchers: Are Theoretical Models Compatible with Canadian Lived Experience? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6 (1):15-.
Christine Czoli, Michael Da Silva, Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Lori D'Agincourt-Canning, Christy Simpson, Katherine Boydell, Natalie Rashkovan & Sharon Vanin (2011). Accountability and Pediatric Physician-Researchers: Are Theoretical Models Compatible with Canadian Lived Experience? [REVIEW] Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6 (1):15.
Similar books and articles
Winston Chiong (2006). The Real Problem with Equipoise. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.
Fred Gifford (2007). Pulling the Plug on Clinical Equipoise: A Critique of Miller and Weijer. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):203-226.
Loretta Kopelman (1986). Consent and Randomized Clinical Trials: Are There Moral or Design Problems? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):317-345.
Marilyn Fischer (1984). Intentions, Rights and Wrongs. Philosophy Research Archives 10:239-247.
Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody (2007). Clinical Equipoise and the Incoherence of Research Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 165.
William A. Parent (1979). Fried on Rights and Moral Personality. [REVIEW] Ethics 90 (1):141 - 156.
Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer (2003). Rehabilitating Equipoise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):93-118.
Jerry Menikoff (2003). Equipoise: Beyond Rehabilitation? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):347-351.
Fred Gifford (1986). The Conflict Between Randomized Clinical Trials and the Therapeutic Obligation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):347-366.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #160,013 of 1,103,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,017 of 1,103,010 )
How can I increase my downloads?