David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1):47 – 60 (2000)
Bryan Norton's convergence hypothesis, which predicts that nonanthropocentric and human-based philosophical positions will actually converge on long-sighted, multi-value environmental policy, has drawn a number of criticisms from within environmental philosophy. In particular, nonanthropocentric theorists like J. Baird Callicott and Laura Westra have rejected the accuracy of Norton's thesis, refusing to believe that his model's contextual appeals to a plurality of human and environmental values will be able adequately to provide for the protection of ecological integrity. These theoretical criticisms of convergence, however, have made no real attempt to engage the empirical validity of the hypothesis, the dimension that Norton clearly takes to be the centerpiece of his project. Accordingly, the present paper attempts to provide an empirical analysis of the convergence argument, by means of a study of the Vermont public's environmental commitments and their attitudes toward national forest policy. Our findings support a generalized version of Norton's thesis, and lead us to suggest that environmental philosophers should try to be more inclusive and empirically minded in their discussions about public moral claims regarding nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robin Attfield (1993). The Ethics of Environmental Concern. Environmental Values 2 (1):76.
Bryan G. Norton (1991). Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford University Press.
Eugene C. Hargrove (1992). Foundations of Environmental Ethics. Philosophy East and West 42 (1):175-177.
Holmes Rolston (1990). [Book Review] Environmental Ethics, Duties to and Values in the Natural World. [REVIEW] Ethics 100:195-197.
J. Baird Callicott (1991). In Defense of the Land Ethic. Philosophy East and West 41 (3):437-441.
Citations of this work BETA
Juan Sanchez & Guillermo Wated (2015). Managerial Tolerance of Nepotism: The Effects of Individualism–Collectivism in a Latin American Context. Journal of Business Ethics 130 (1):45-57.
Benjamin R. Cohen (2009). The Once and Future Georgic: Agricultural Practice, Environmental Knowledge, and the Place for an Ethic of Experience. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 26 (3):153-165.
Katherine W. Robinson & Kevin C. Elliott (2011). Environmental Aesthetics and Public Environmental Philosophy. Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):175 - 191.
Similar books and articles
Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne (2010). The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments. Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
Tang Yijie & Yan Xin (2008). The Contemporary Significance of Confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477 - 501.
H. M. Malm (1989). Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum. Hypatia 4 (3):128 - 135.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (II). Religious Studies 41 (3):287 - 303.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #115,510 of 1,725,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #210,933 of 1,725,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?