David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):131-156 (2004)
Many nonanthropocentric environmental ethicists subscribe to a ``principle-ist'''' approach to moral argument, whereby specific natural resource and environmental policy judgments are deduced from the prior articulation of a general moral principle. More often than not, this principle is one requiring the promotion of the intrinsic value of nonhuman nature. Yet there are several problems with this method of moral reasoning, including the short-circuiting of reflective inquiry and the disregard of the complex nature of specific environmental problems and policy arguments. In the present paper, we advance an alternative, pragmatic contextualist approach to environmental ethics, one grounded in the moral theory of John Dewey. We present the results of an empirical study of public environmental ethics and natural resource management attitudes to support our position, and we conclude with a few recommendations for future inquiry in the field of environmental ethics.
|Keywords||contextualism empirical study environmental ethics pragmatism public attitudes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Willis Jenkins (2011). Environmental Pragmatism, Adaptive Management, and Cultural Reform. Ethics and the Environment 16 (1):51-74.
Frank Kupper & Tjard Cock Bunindeg (2011). Deliberating Animal Values: A Pragmatic—Pluralistic Approach to Animal Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):431-450.
David Fraser (2012). A “Practical” Ethic for Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):721-746.
Benjamin R. Cohen (2009). The Once and Future Georgic: Agricultural Practice, Environmental Knowledge, and the Place for an Ethic of Experience. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 26 (3):153-165.
Simon D. Norton (2007). The Natural Environment as a Salient Stakeholder: Non-Anthropocentrism, Ecosystem Stability and the Financial Markets. Business Ethics 16 (4):387–402.
Similar books and articles
Ben A. Minteer (2012). Refounding Environmental Ethics: Pragmatism, Principle, and Practice. Temple University Press.
Daniel L. Dustin & Leo H. McAvoy (1984). Toward Environmental Eolithism. Environmental Ethics 6 (2):161-166.
Laura Westra (2009). Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press. 279-297.
Ben A. Minteer (ed.) (2009). Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
Eric Katz (1987). Searching for Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism and Despair in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 9 (3):231-241.
Eric Katz (1999). A Pragmatic Reconsideration of Anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):377-390.
Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics: Democracy, Pluralism, and the Management of Nature. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Ben A. Minteer (2001). Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists? Environmental Ethics 23 (1):57-75.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #42,710 of 1,096,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #47,418 of 1,096,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?