In Defense of the Ideal of a Life Plan

Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):159-186 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle claims at Eudemian Ethics 1.2 that everyone who can live according to his own choice should adopt some goal for the good life, which he will keep in view in all his actions, for not to have done so is a sign of folly. This is an opinion shared by other ancients as well as some moderns. Others believe, however, that this view is false to the human condition, and provide a number of objections: (1) you can’t plan love; (2) nor life’s surprises; (3) planning a whole life is of no use since the world changes too much; (4) as do our values; and (5) planning a life is something only dreary people would do. The aim of this paper is to examine these objections, as part of a broader attempt to defend the relevance of a eudaimonistic approach to the question of how to live well

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Good life and the human good.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 1992 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
A life not worth living?Craig Paterson - 2003 - Studies in Christian Ethics 16 (2):1-20.
Is life of infinite value?Dena S. Davis - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (3):239-246.
Aristotle on the choice of lives: Two concepts of self-sufficiency.Eric Brown - 2014 - In Pierre Destrée & Marco Antônio Zingano (eds.), Theoria: Studies on the Status and Meaning of Contemplation in Aristotle's Ethics. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters Publishing. pp. 111-133.
The sanctity-of-life doctrine in medicine: a critique.Helga Kuhse - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Good Cause Account of the Meaning of Life.Aaron Smuts - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):536-562.
Mill and Barry on the Foundations of Liberal Rights.Alex Voorhoeve - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 46:78-82.
Understanding What’s Good for Us.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):429 - 439.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
59 (#243,326)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Mintoff
Australian National University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Natural law and natural rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 41 references / Add more references