From Opposition to Reciprocity: Karl Jaspers on Science, Philosophy and What Lies Between Them

This article deals with the relationship between philosophy and science in the writings of Karl Jaspers and with its reception in the wider scholarly literature. The problem discussed is how to characterize the relationship that exists between science—defined on pure Kantian grounds as a universally valid knowledge of phenomenal objects—and philosophy—conceived by Jaspers as the transcending mode of thinking of personal Existenz rising towards the totality and unity of Being. Two solutions to that problem arise from Jaspers’s writings. The oppositionist view is based in his earlier philosophy of Existenz. It describes the discrepancy between determinateness, bestowed by science to its objects, and freedom of self-determination, which is both a synonym and a condition of possibility for Existenz. The reciprocal view is based in Jaspers’s later works, where he focuses on exploration of his concept of Being (das Umgreifende). By contrast with most of Jaspers’s commentators, the present interpretation is anchored in a developmentaland contextual understanding of Jaspers’s thought. Showing the transcendental background of this topic, the proposed interpretation allows us to abstain from viewing the two solutions as incoherent or contradictory and instead to see them as constitutive of a single philosophical course
Keywords Karl Jaspers
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/ipq20044427
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Ronny Miron, From Opposition to Reciprocity: Karl Jaspers on Science, Philosophy and What Lies Between Them
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
James A. Montmarquet (2009). Jaspers, the Axial Age, and Christianity. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):239-254.
Jennifer Anna Gosetti (2002). Tragedy and Truth in Heidegger and Jaspers. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):301-314.
Johannes Roessler (2001). Understanding Delusions of Alien Control. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 8 (2-3):177-187.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

664 ( #1,371 of 1,926,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

166 ( #589 of 1,926,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.