Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 22 (1):210-228 (2007)
|Abstract||: In this essay, Miriam argues for a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach to the radical feminist theory of sex-right and compulsory heterosexuality. Against critics of radical feminism, she argues that when understood from a phenomenological-hermeneutic perspective, such theory does not foreclose female sexual agency. On the contrary, men's right of sexual access to women and girls is part of our background understanding of heteronormativity, and thus integral to the lived experience of female sexual agency|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Myra J. Hird (2004). Sex, Gender, and Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Louise C. Johnson (2000). Placebound: Australian Feminist Geographies. Oxford University Press.
Ofelia Schutte (1997). A Critique of Normative Heterosexuality: Identity, Embodiment, and Sexual Difference in Beauvoir and Irigaray. Hypatia 12 (1):40 - 62.
Chris Weedon (1999). Feminism, Theory, and the Politics of Difference. Blackwell Publishers.
Rosi Braidotti (2011). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Columbia University Press.
Chrys Ingraham (1994). The Heterosexual Imaginary: Feminist Sociology and Theories of Gender. Sociological Theory 12 (2):203-219.
Linda Lemoncheck (1998). Loose Women, Lecherous Men: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex. Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.
Igor Primoratz (2001). Sexual Morality: Is Consent Enough? [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):201-218.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,911 of 740,432 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,802 of 740,432 )
How can I increase my downloads?