The scientific dimensions of social knowledge and their distant echoes in 20th-century American philosophy of science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):283-326 (2004)
|Abstract||The widespread impression that recent philosophy of science has pioneered exploration of the “social dimensions of scientific knowledge‘ is shown to be in error, partly due to a lack of appreciation of historical precedent, and partly due to a misunderstanding of how the social sciences and philosophy have been intertwined over the last century. This paper argues that the referents of “democracy‘ are an important key in the American context, and that orthodoxies in the philosophy of science tend to be molded by the actual regimes of science organization within which they are embedded. These theses are illustrated by consideration of three representative philosophers of science: John Dewey, Hans Reichenbach, and Philip Kitcher. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]|
|Keywords||philosophy American social sciences context of discovery/justification democracy aims of science logical positivism social dimensions of science John Dewey Philip Kitcher|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arnon Keren (2011). Disagreement, Democracy, and the Goals of Science: Is a Normative Philosophy of Science Possible, If Ethical Inquiry Is Not? Philosophy 86 (04):525-544.
Matthew J. Brown (2010). Genuine Problems and the Significance of Science. Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):131-153.
Philip Kitcher (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (2012). From Mathematics to Social Concern About Science: Kitcher's Philosophical Approach. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):11-93.
Helen E. Longino (2002). Science and the Common Good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher's Science, Truth, and Democracy. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):560-568.
Kei Yoshida (2012). Re-Politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology. Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):365-378.
Philip Kitcher (forthcoming). Authority, Deference, and the Role of Individual Reasoning in Science. The Social Dimensions of Science.
Philip Kitcher (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
William A. Rottschaefer (2004). Naturalizing or Demythologizing Scientific Inquiry: Kitcher's: Science, Truth and Democracy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3):408-422.
Brian Fay (2006). For Science in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
Jeremy R. Simon (2006). The Proper Ends of Science: Philip Kitcher, Science, and the Good. Philosophy of Science 73 (2):194-214.
Kristina Rolin (2004). Why Gender is a Relevant Factor in the Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891.
Kristina Rolin (2004). Why Gender Is a Relevant Factor in the Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,125 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,125 )
How can I increase my downloads?