|Abstract||The paper challenges the entrenched equation of conceptual with apriori. It develops the idea of at least dual justification of a single piece of belief, at a deep, ultimate level and at the surface, immediately accessible to the thinker. Apriori justification then also admits of different degrees of depth. A proposition is deeply apriori for a cognizer if its ultimate ground is apriori, otherwise it is only superficially apriori . In the case of empirically applicable concepts, some of their concept-analyzing propositions are justified apriori only at the surface. Deeply, they are aposteriori, being originally straightforward empirical propositions. It is argued that there is no reason to suppose that they change their epistemic status once build into a concept.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Manuel Bächtold (2011). L'espace Dans Ses Dimensions Transcendantale Et Pragmatiste. Kant-Studien 102 (2):145-167.
Tyler Burge (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-48.
Marie-Luise Kalsi (1995). Apriori Concepts. Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):1-14.
Tyler Burge (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-548.
Norwood Russell Hanson (1962). The Very Idea of a Synthetic-Apriori. Mind 71 (284):521-524.
Isidora Stojanović (2004). The Contingent A Priori. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):291-300.
Lisa Warenski (2009). Naturalism, Fallibilism, and the a Priori. Philosophical Studies 142 (3):403 - 426.
Tyler Burge (2003). Logic and Analyticity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):199-249.
Nenad Miščević (2005). Is Apriority Context-Sensitive? Acta Analytica 20 (1):55-80.
Laura Schroeter (2006). Against A Priori Reductions. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):562-586.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #29,458 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?