Defending Alexander of aphrodisias in the age of the counter-reformation: Iacopo zabarella on the mortality of the soul according to Aristotle
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):330-354 (2009)
The work of the Paduan Aristotelian philosopher Iacopo Zabarella (1533–1589) has attracted the attention of historians of philosophy mainly for his contributions to logic, scientific methodology and because of his possible influence on Galileo. At the same time, Zabarella's views on Aristotelian psychology have been little studied so far; even those historians of Renaissance philosophy who have discussed them, have based their analysis mainly on the psychological essays included in Zabarella's De rebus naturalibus , but have avoided Zabarella's commentary on Aristotle's De anima . This has led to an inaccurate, but widespread, understanding of Zabarella's views. The intention of this article is to provide a systematic analysis of Zabarella's arguments about the (im)mortality of the soul in the context of Aristotelian psychology. Zabarella's view that the soul is mortal according to Aristotle is remarkable for his time, while his elaboration of this position is far more comprehensive than that of Pietro Pomponazzi, the other significant Renaissance thinker who shared the same view.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Benjamin Goldberg (2013). A Dark Business, Full of Shadows: Analogy and Theology in William Harvey. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):419-432.
Similar books and articles
Averroës (2002). Averroës' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima: A Critical Edition of the Arabic Text. Brigham Young University Press.
Abraham P. Bos (2010). The Soul's Instrument for Touching in Aristotle, on the Soul II 11, 422b34–423a21. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (1):89-102.
A. P. Bos (2003). The Soul and Its Instrumental Body: A Reinterpretation of Aristotle's Philosophy of Living Nature. Brill.
Lodi Nauta (2008). From an Outsider's Point of View: Lorenzo Valla on the Soul. Vivarium 46 (3):368-391.
James B. South (2005). Zabarella, Prime Matter, and the Theory of Regressus. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 26 (2):79-98.
Ronald M. Polansky (2007). Aristotle's de Anima. Cambridge University Press.
Heikki Mikkeli, Giacomo Zabarella. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Heikki Mikkeli (1992). An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences. The Finnish Historical Society.
Heikki Mikkeli (2010). Jacopo Zabarella (1533-1589) : The Structure and Method of Scientific Knowledge. In Paul Richard Blum (ed.), Philosophers of the Renaissance. Catholic University of America Press 181-191.
Added to index2009-09-01
Total downloads34 ( #118,453 of 1,907,219 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #276,350 of 1,907,219 )
How can I increase my downloads?