Mach's mechanics and absolute space and time
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):565-583 (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSteven Weinstein (2001). Absolute Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):67-73.
Steven Weinstein (2001). Absolute Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):67-73.
Eduard I. Sorkin (2008). Rethinking Ideas of Newton, Berkeley and Mach Today. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:501-509.
Robert Rynasiewicz, Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Bradford Skow (2007). Sklar's Maneuver. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):777 - 786.
Nick Huggett, Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Motion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Frank Arntzenius (2003). Is Quantum Mechanics Pointless? Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1447-1457.
Frank Arntzenius (2003). Is Quantum Mechanics Pointless? Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1447-1457.
J. Finkelstein (1999). Space-Time Counterfactuals. Synthese 119 (3):287-298.
John T. Roberts (2003). Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Erik C. Banks (2001). Ernst Mach and the Episode of the Monocular Depth Sensations. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37 (4):327-348.
Robert Rynasiewicz (1992). Why the New Theory of Reference Does Not Entail Absolute Time and Space. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):508-509.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads5 ( #160,483 of 549,370 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
