Graduate studies at Western
Nanoethics 3 (2):79-96 (2009)
|Abstract||Using long-term anthropological observations at the Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology in Houston, Texas, the article demonstrates in detail the creation of new objects, new venues and new modes of veridiction which have reoriented the disciplines of materials chemistry and nanotoxicology. Beginning with the confusion surrounding the meaning of ‘implications’ and ‘applications’ the article explores the creation of new venues (CBEN and its offshoot the International Council on Nanotechnology); it then demonstrates how the demands for a responsible, safe or ethical science were translated into new research and experiment in and through these venues. Finally it shows how ‘safety by design’ emerged as a way to go beyond implications and applications, even as it introduced a whole new array of controversies concerning its viability, validity and legitimacy|
|Keywords||Anthropology Buckminsterfullerenes Environmental engineering Ethnography Materials chemistry Responsibility Toxicology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher M. Kelty (2009). Beyond Implications and Applications: The Story of 'Safety by Design'. [REVIEW] Nanoethics 3 (2):79-96.
M. Zimmer (2005). Surveillance, Privacy and the Ethics of Vehicle Safety Communication Technologies. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):201-210.
Robert Sparrow (2009). Building a Better Warbot: Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):169-187.
Sven Ove Hansson (2006). Safe Design. Techné 10 (1):45-52.
Oliver Stiemerling & Armin B. Cremers (2000). TheEvolve Project: Component-Based Tailorability for CSCW Applications. [REVIEW] AI and Society 14 (1):120-141.
William Goodwin (2009). Scientific Understanding and Synthetic Design. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):271-301.
William Mark Goodwin (2009). Scientific Understanding and Synthetic Design. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):271-301.
Liza Dawson, Alison S. Bateman-House, Dawn Mueller Agnew, Hilary Bok, Dan W. Brock, Aravinda Chakravarti, Mark Greene, Patricia King, Stephen J. O'Brien, David H. Sachs, Kathryn E. Schill, Andrew Siegel & Davor Solter (2003). Safety Issues In Cell-Based Intervention Trials. Fertility and Sterility 80 (5):1077-1085.
Nick Turner & Sarah J. Tennant (2010). “As Far as is Reasonably Practicable”: Socially Constructing Risk, Safety, and Accidents in Military Operations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):21 - 33.
Vladimir Labay & Amber McKee Anderson (2006). Ethical Considerations and Proposed Guidelines for the Use of Radio Frequency Identification: Especially Concerning its Use for Promoting Public Safety and National Security. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):265-272.
K. Praveen Parboteeah & Edward Andrew Kapp (2008). Ethical Climates and Workplace Safety Behaviors: An Empirical Investigation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):515 - 529.
Dani Rabinowitz, &Quot;the Safety Condition for Knowledge&Quot;. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
James A. E. Macpherson (2008). Safety, Risk Acceptability, and Morality. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):377-390.
Yuriko Saito (2002). Ecological Design: Promises and Challenges. Environmental Ethics 24 (3):243-261.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-11
Total downloads1 ( #292,081 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?