David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 20 (2):127-140 (2011)
Confucianism is a kind of humanism. Confucian humanism presupposes, however, a divisive act that separates human and nonhuman. This paper shows that the split between the human and the nonhuman is central to Mencius' moral psychology, and it argues that Confucianism is an anthropological machine in the sense of the term used by Giorgio Agamben. I consider the main points of early Daoist critique of Confucian humanism. A comparative analysis of Herman Melville's novella 'Bartleby the Scrivener' reveals the limitation of the moral will in Mencius. Finally, I refer to an incident that recently captured the imagination of Chinese netizens, and shows the contested influence of Confucian humanism in contemporary China
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. C. Lau (2005). Mencius. Penguin Classics.
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Giorgio Agamben (2004). The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford University Press.
Giorgio Agamben (1999). Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
Eske Møllgaard (2007). An Introduction to Daoist Thought: Action, Language, and Ethics in Zhuangzi. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
Pak‐Hang Wong (2015). Confucian Environmental Ethics, Climate Engineering, and the “Playing God” Argument. Zygon 50 (1):28-41.
Ruyu Hung (2015). To Be As Not To Be: In Search of an Alternative Humanism in the Light of Early Daoism and Deconstruction. Journal of Philosophy of Education 49 (3):418-434.
Similar books and articles
Zhiming Song (2007). Achievements, Predicaments and Trend of Moral Confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):503-516.
Xiangjun Li (2006). A Reconstruction of Contemporary Confucianism as a Form of Knowledge. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):561-571.
Wenhua Chai (2006). Traditional Confucianism in Modern China: Ma Yifu's Ethical Thought. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):366-381.
Yushun Huang (2007). Return to Life and Reconstruct Confucianism: An Outline of Comparative Study on Confucianism and Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):454-473.
David Elstein (2010). Why Early Confucianism Cannot Generate Democracy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):427-443.
Yen-Zen Tsai (2008). Selfhood and Fiduciary Community: A Smithian Reading of Tu Weiming's Confucian Humanism. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (4):349-365.
Eske Møllgaard (2007). Is Tu Wei-Ming Confucian? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):397-411.
Chʻu Chai (1965). The Humanist Way in Ancient China. New York, Bantam Books.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads9 ( #341,453 of 1,790,385 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #431,678 of 1,790,385 )
How can I increase my downloads?