The compatibility of relevance and Mingle
Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (3):279 - 297 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPing Tian (2009). Narrow Memory and Wide Knowledge: An Argument for the Compatibility of Externalism and Self-Knowledge. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):604-615.
J. Michael Dunn (1970). Algebraic Completeness Results for R-Mingle and its Extensions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):1-13.
James P. Delgrande & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (1998). A Formal Analysis of Relevance. Erkenntnis 49 (2):137-173.
Tongdong Bai (2008). A Mencian Version of Limited Democracy. Res Publica 14 (1).
Gary Iseminger (1998). Interpretive Relevance, Contradiction, and Compatibility with the Text: A Rejoinder to Knight. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (1):58-61.
Michael A. McRobbie & Nuel D. Belnap (1979). Relevant Analytic Tableaux. Studia Logica 38 (2):187 - 200.
José M. Méndez (1990). Exhaustively Axiomatizing RMO with an Appropiate Extension of Anderson and Belnap's “Strong and Natural List of Valid Entailments”. Theoria 5 (1):223-228.
Norihiro Kamide (2002). Substructural Logics with Mingle. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):227-249.
José M. Méndez (2010). Erratum To: The Compatibility of Relevance and Mingle. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
