International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):135 - 148 (2007)
|Abstract||I propose a framework for comparative Islamic—Western ethics in which the Islamic categories "Islam, Iman," and "Ihsan" are juxtaposed with the concepts of obligation, value, and virtue, respectively. I argue that "shari'a" refers to both the obligation component and the entire structure of the Islamic ethic; suggesting a suspension of the understanding of "shari'a" as simply Islamic "law," and an alternative understanding of "usul al-fiqh" as a moral epistemology of obligation. I will test this approach by addressing the question of reason in Islamic moral epistemology via an examination of an argument advanced by a founding usul scholar Muhammad bin Idrīs al-Shāfi'ī (150 A.H./767 C.E.)|
|Keywords||Islam Sharī‘ah Ethics Moral Epistemology Fiqh Usul|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. A. Cook (2000). Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought. Cambridge University Press.
John Walbridge (2010). God and Logic in Islam: The Caliphate of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Murtaz̤á Muṭahharī (2002). Understanding Islamic Sciences: Philosophy, Theology, Mysticism, Morality, Jurisprudence. Saqi.
John Kelsay (2003). Al-Shaybani and the Islamic Law of War. Journal of Military Ethics 2 (1):63-75.
Andrew F. March, Sources of Moral Obligation to Non-Muslims in the Fiqh Al-Aqalliyyat (Jurisprudence of Muslim Minorities) Discourse.
Abdul Kabir Hussain Solihu & Abdul Rauf Ambali (2011). Dissolving the Engineering Moral Dilemmas Within the Islamic Ethico-Legal Praxes. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):133-147.
A. Kevin Reinhart (1983). Islamic Law as Islamic Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (2):186 - 203.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #49,781 of 722,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?