Comparing phases of skepticism in al-ghazālī and Descartes: Some first meditations on deliverance from error
Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 88-101 (2009)
|Abstract||Abū Hāmid al-Ghazālī (1058–1111 c.e .) is well known, among other things, for his account, in al-Munqidh min al-ḍalāl (Deliverance from error), of a struggle with philosophical skepticism that bears a striking resemblance to that described by Descartes in the Meditations . This essay aims to give a close comparative analysis of these respective accounts, and will concentrate solely on the processes of invoking or entertaining doubt that al-Ghazālī and Descartes describe, respectively. In the process some subtle differences between them in this regard will be brought to light that are relevant to the comparative issue of the respective solutions at which they arrive. The latter issue will not be touched upon here, although the present discussion is intended as a prelude to a future treatment of that topic.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Olli Lagerspetz (2010). Descartes' Error, with Reference to the Third and Fourth Meditations. Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):303-320.
Ignacio L. Götz (2003). The Quest for Certainty. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:1-22.
Edward Omar Moad (2007). Al-Ghazali on Power, Causation, and 'Acquisition'. Philosophy East and West 57 (1):1-13.
Ghazzālī (1953). The Faith and Practice of Al-Ghazālī. London, G. Allen and Unwin.
Tamara Albertini (2005). Crisis and Certainty of Knowledge in Al-Ghazali (1058-1111) and Descartes (1596-1650). Philosophy East and West 55 (1):1-14.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads81 ( #9,497 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #4,233 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?