Prenatal genetic testing kits sold at your local pharmacy: Promoting autonomy or promoting confusion?
Bioethics 20 (5):254–263 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRosamund Scott (2005). Prenatal Testing, Reproductive Autonomy, and Disability Interests. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (01).
Anders Schinkel (2010). Compulsory Autonomy-Promoting Education. Educational Theory 60 (1):97-116.
Ludvig Beckman (2004). Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6).
A. Boyce & P. Borry (2009). Parental Authority, Future Autonomy, and Assessing Risks of Predictive Genetic Testing in Minors. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3).
Rebecca Bennett (2001). Antenatal Genetic Testing and the Right to Remain in Ignorance. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5).
A. Kent (2000). Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States. Final Report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing: Edited by Neil A Holtzmann and Michael S Watson, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1998, 186 Pages, Pound23.00 (Pb). [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):482-482.
Elisabeth Hildt (2002). Autonomy and Freedom of Choice in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,265 of 551,105 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,105 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
