“Everyone may think whatever they like, but scientists...”: Or how and to what end plant scientists manage the science-society relationship [Book Review]

Abstract

In this study, the authors examine the performative functions of scientists’ discursive constructions of the science-society relationship. They use discursive psychology to analyze interviews with Dutch plant scientists and show that interviewees contrast the freedom of people in the private sphere with scientists’ responsibilities in the professional sphere to regulate “lay” access to science. To accomplish this, interviewees make claims about the scientific value of lay views only after they have displayed their tolerance of these views. Additionally, many interviewees refer to their own lay status in everyday life. Finally, the relationship between findings and recent science communication approaches is discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.
Simple or Simplistic? Scientists' Views on Occam's Razor.Hauke Riesch - 2010 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 25 (1):75-90.
The social responsibilities of biological scientists.Stanley Joel Reiser & Ruth E. Bulger - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):137-143.
Studying the study of science scientifically.David L. Hull - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (3):209-231.
Science, Ignorance and Human Values.Michael Smithson - 1996 - Journal of Human Values 2 (1):67-81.
Scientists' thoughts on scientific models.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (3):275-301.
Is Philosophy a 'Theory of Everything'?G. M. K. Hunt - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 33:219-231.
The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science.Michael Strevens - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):159-170.
Why scientists should cooperate with journalists.Boyce Rensberger - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):549-552.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-01

Downloads
4 (#1,599,757)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bart Gremmen
Wageningen University and Research

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references