David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We analyzed the variability of response in records obtained from MT (V5) of awake, behaving monkeys and kindly provided to us by Newsome and Bair (see Newsome et al 1990 for Methods). Some sets of random dot kinematograms had been generated with a constant randomization seed (novar stimuli), while others had been generated with varying randomization seeds (var stimuli). The neural responses to novar stimuli exhibited a remarkable degree of consistent temporal modulation, while the responses to var stimuli were homogeneous over the presentation time. We suspected that correspondence noise might be a major source of variability and to test this we compared the variability of response to novar and var stimuli, making the assumption that the variability observed in responses to novar stimuli reflected the internal noise only, whereas variability in the case of var stimuli reflected internal noise and external noise. From this assumption, we could estimate the relative importance of external noise and internal noise in this system. The main conclusions are:- (1) Efficiency values (up to about 35%) calculated from neural responses in MT are of the same order as those of human observers, (Barlow and Tripathy 1997) (2) External correspondence noise is a significant factor in limiting the detectability of coherent motion in these random dot stimuli.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Constantine Sedikides & Aiden P. Gregg (2002). Internal Mechanisms That Implicate the Self Enlighten the Egoism-Altruism Debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):274-275.
K. Moutoussis, G. A. Keliris, Z. Kourtzi & N. K. Logothetis (2005). A Binocular Rivalry Study of Motion Perception in the Human Brain. Vision Research 45 (17):2231-43.
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov & Damir D. Dzhafarov (2010). Sorites Without Vagueness I: Classificatory Sorites. Theoria 76 (1):4-24.
Bartlomiej Swiatczak & Maria Rescigno (2012). How the Interplay Between Antigen Presenting Cells and Microbiota Tunes Host Immune Responses in the Gut. Seminars in Immunology 24 (1):43-49.
David J. Murray (1999). A “Presence/Absence Hypothesis” Concerning Hippocampal Function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):462-463.
William W. Rozeboom (1960). Do Stimuli Elicit Behavior?--A Study in the Logical Foundations of Behavioristics. Philosophy of Science 27 (2):159-170.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #227,658 of 1,934,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,878 of 1,934,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?