Anatomy of a Hoax: Holocaust Denial

Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 4 (11):17-27 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The phenomenon of Holocaust denial, once considered a fringe manifestation with very little impact, has, more or less, entered the mainstream of historiographical and academic debate in recent years. The main danger associated with the deniers’ discourse is that of forcing into the public conscience the awareness of the fact that there might be “more sides” to the Holocaust history than previously known based on written documents, testimonies of survivors and other types of proofs. The following paper is a review of the emergence, development and extent of Holocaust denial, especially in the United States, as well as an attempt to summarise the deniers’ arguments, claims and motivations, following the line opened by Deborah Lipstadt and other historians

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Six questions on (or about) holocaust denial.Berel Lang - 2010 - History and Theory 49 (2):157-168.
Mass media & mass murder: American coverage of the holocaust.Evelyn Kennerly - 1986 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2 (1):61 – 70.
The logic of the goldhagen debate.Richard Kamber - 2000 - Res Publica 6 (2):155-177.
Memory of the Holocaust: Sources.Janina Bauman - 2007 - Thesis Eleven 91 (1):78-88.
The Holocaust and the Postmodern.Robert Eaglestone - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
30 (#517,657)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references