Could you think carruthers’ ideas without having to speak them? Talk with yourself if you want to have any thought on that
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):692-693 (2002)
|Abstract||First, the importance of language in cognition is recognized. Nevertheless, this does not necessarily imply that the locus of thought is natural language (words, syntax, phonology). Then, difficulties with some of Carruthers’ hypotheses are stated: Is an account based on LFs capable of dealing with the complexities involved in what we call thought? Finally, mention of the issue of language production is made.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gerard O'Brien & Jon Opie (2002). Internalizing Communication. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):694-695.
Peter Carruthers (2008). Précis of the Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Mind and Language 23 (3):257–262.
Peter Carruthers & Jill Boucher (eds.) (1998). Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge University Press.
Agustín Vicente & Fernando MartínezManrique (2005). Semantic Underdetermination and the Cognitive Uses of Language. Mind and Language 20 (5):537–558.
Phillip Robbins (2002). What Domain Integration Could Not Be. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):696-697.
P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (eds.) (1998). Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Christopher Gauker (2002). No Conceptual Thought Without Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687.
Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2008). Thought, Language, and the Argument From Explicitness. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):381–401.
Peter Carruthers (1996). Language, Thought, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #188,906 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?