Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):197 – 207 (2007)
|Abstract||The use of brain scanning now dominates the cognitive sciences, but important questions remain to be answered about what, exactly, scanning can tell us. One corner of cognitive science that has been transformed by the use of neuroimaging, and that a scanning enthusiast might point to as proof of scanning's importance, is the study of face perception. Against this view, we argue that the use of scanning has, in fact, told us rather little about the information processing underlying face perception and that it is not likely to tell us much more|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jochen Hennig (2004). Changes in the Design of Scanning Tunneling Microscopic Images From 1980 to 1990. Techné 8 (2):36-55.
Adam Lindgreen, Michael Antioco, David Harness & Remi van der Sloot (2009). Purchasing and Marketing of Social and Environmental Sustainability for High-Tech Medical Equipment. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):445 - 462.
K. Doré-Mazars (1999). Where and When Does the What System Play a Role in Eye Movement Control? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):680-681.
Gabriele Gratton, Monica Fabiani & Paul M. Corballis (2001). Working Memory Capacity and the Hemispheric Organization of the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):121-122.
James J. Clark (1999). Linking Covert and Overt Attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):676-677.
Aaron Kagan (2007). Face to Face with an Enactive Approach: A Sensorimotor Account of Face Detection and Recognition. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4):509-525.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads74 ( #13,674 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #7,654 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?