Intensional verbs and their intentional objects
Natural Language Semantics 16 (3):239-270 (2008)
| Abstract | The complement of intensional transitive verbs, like any nonreferential complement, can be replaced by a ‘special quantifier’ or ‘special pronoun’ such as 'something', 'the same thing', or 'what'. In this paper, I will defend the ‘Nominalization Theory’ of special quantifiers against a range of apparent counterexamples involving intensional transitive verbs | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKatalin Farkas (2010). Independent Intentional Objects. In Tadeusz Czarnecki, Katarzyna Kijanija-Placek, Olga Poller & Jan Wolenski (eds.), The Analytical Way. College Publications.
Takashi Yagisawa (2001). Partee Verbs. Philosophical Studies 103 (3):253 - 270.
Paul Egré (2008). Question-Embedding and Factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):85-125.
Steven E. Boër (2009). Propositions and the Substitution Anomaly. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (5):549 - 586.
Zoltán Gendler Szabó (2005). Sententialism and Berkeley's Master Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):462 - 474.
Anna Szabolcsi (forthcoming). Certain Verbs Are Syntactically Explicit Quantifiers. In Skilters Jurgis & Partee Barbara (eds.), Baltic International Yearbook, Vol. 6. (2011). U of Riga, Latvia.
Georges Rey (2007). Resisting Normativism in Psychology. In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,078 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
