Mind 113 (449):1-41 (2004)
|Abstract||Terms such as 'wisdom' or 'happiness' are commonly held to refer to abstract objects that are properties. On the basis of a greater range of linguistic data and with the support of some ancient and medieval philosophical views, I argue that such terms do not stand for objects, but rather for kinds of tropes, entities that do not have the status of objects, but only play a role as semantic values of terms and as arguments of predicates. Such ‘non-objects’ crucially differ from objects in that they are not potential bearers of properties.|
|Keywords||trope count noun mass noun count noun|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bo Mou (1999). The Structure of the Chinese Language and Ontological Insights: A Collective-Noun Hypothesis. Philosophy East and West 49 (1):45-62.
Paweł Rojek (2008). Three Trope Theories. Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
Peter Lasersohn (1989). On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (1):130-134.
Roger Schwarzschild, Stubborn Distributivity, Multiparticipant Nouns and the Count/Mass Distinction.
John Justice (2007). Unified Semantics of Singular Terms. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):363–373.
Xiaomei Yang (2011). Do Differences in Grammatical Form Between Languages Explain Differences in Ontology Between Different Philosophical Traditions?: A Critique of the Mass-Noun Hypothesis. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):149-166.
Bas C. van Fraassen (1995). `World' is Not a Count Noun. Noûs 29 (2):139-157.
Henry Laycock (2005). 'Mass Nouns, Count Nouns and Non-Count Nouns'. In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #23,087 of 549,067 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,324 of 549,067 )
How can I increase my downloads?