Graduate studies at Western
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):483-502 (2009)
|Abstract||Some works of literature are compromised because their authors get the facts wrong. In other works deviations from the facts don’t seem to matter, and authors quite legitimately make things up. This paper gives an account of the various ways in which matters of fact can make a difference to the aesthetic value of works of literature. It concludes by showing how this account can be applied in determining when a concern with matters of fact is an important part of literary criticism and when it is merely pedantic.|
|Keywords||Fiction Authorship Aesthetics Hermaneutics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). On the Body of Literary Persuasion. Estetika 47 (1):51-71.
Bijoy H. Boruah (1988). Fiction and Emotion: A Study in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Peter Lamarque (2007). Aesthetics and Literature: A Problematic Relation? Philosophical Studies 135 (1):27 - 40.
G. J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.) (2010). Authorship Revisited: Conceptions of Authorship Around 1900 and 2000. Peeters.
Jonathan Lamb (2011). The Things Things Say. Princeton University Press.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Contemplation and Hypotheses in Literature. Philosophical Frontiers 5 (1):73-83.
Jukka Mikkonen, Implicit Assertions in Literary Fiction. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, vol. 2.
Sarah E. Worth (2007). The Dangers of da Vinci, or the Power of Popular Fiction. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):134-143.
Peter Lamarque (1994). Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-09-05
Total downloads37 ( #36,967 of 723,496 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,098 of 723,496 )
How can I increase my downloads?