Paradigm change in evolutionary microbiology

Abstract
Thomas Kuhn had little to say about scientific change in biological science, and biologists are ambivalent about how applicable his framework is for their disciplines. We apply Kuhn’s account of paradigm change to evolutionary microbiology, where key Darwinian tenets are being challenged by two decades of findings from molecular phylogenetics. The chief culprit is lateral gene transfer, which undermines the role of vertical descent and the representation of evolutionary history as a tree of life. To assess Kuhn’s relevance to this controversy, we add a social analysis of the scientists involved to the historical and philosophical debates. We conclude that while Kuhn’s account may capture aspects of the pattern of an episode of scientific change, he has little to say about how the process of generating new understandings is occurring in evolutionary microbiology. Once Kuhn’s application is limited to that of an initial investigative probe into how scientific problem-solving occurs, his disciplinary scope becomes broader
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,242
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Douglas Allchin (1994). The Super Bowl and the Ox-Phos Controversy: "Winner-Take-All" Competition in Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:22 - 33.
Barry Barnes (2003). Thomas Kuhn and the Problem of Social Order in Science. In Thomas Nickles (ed.), Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge University Press 122.
Alexander Bird (2002). Kuhn's Wrong Turning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):443-463.

View all 29 references

Citations of this work BETA
Ipek Demir (2008). Incommensurabilities in the Work of Thomas Kuhn. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):133-142.
Edna Suárez-Díaz (2009). Molecular Evolution: Concepts and the Origin of Disciplines. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 40 (1):43-53.

View all 8 citations

Similar books and articles
Maureen A. O'Malley & John Dupré (2007). Towards a Philosophy of Microbiology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (4):775-779.
Michael Ruse (1987). Is Sociobiology a New Paradigm? Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
Stuart A. Newman (2012). What's New. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 4 (20130604).
John Rader Platt (1970). Perception and Change. Ann Arbor,University of Michigan Press.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-30

Total downloads

9 ( #231,597 of 1,699,803 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,803 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.