David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (1):183-208 (2005)
Thomas Kuhn had little to say about scientific change in biological science, and biologists are ambivalent about how applicable his framework is for their disciplines. We apply Kuhn’s account of paradigm change to evolutionary microbiology, where key Darwinian tenets are being challenged by two decades of findings from molecular phylogenetics. The chief culprit is lateral gene transfer, which undermines the role of vertical descent and the representation of evolutionary history as a tree of life. To assess Kuhn’s relevance to this controversy, we add a social analysis of the scientists involved to the historical and philosophical debates. We conclude that while Kuhn’s account may capture aspects of the pattern of an episode of scientific change, he has little to say about how the process of generating new understandings is occurring in evolutionary microbiology. Once Kuhn’s application is limited to that of an initial investigative probe into how scientific problem-solving occurs, his disciplinary scope becomes broader
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Joel D. Velasco (2012). The Future of Systematics: Tree Thinking Without the Tree. Philosophy of Science 79 (5):624-636.
Werner Callebaut (2011). Beyond Generalized Darwinism. II. More Things in Heaven and Earth. Biological Theory 6 (4):351-365.
Edna Suárez-Díaz (2013). The Long and Winding Road of Molecular Data in Phylogenetic Analysis. Journal of the History of Biology:1-36.
Similar books and articles
Massimo Pigliucci (2009). The Evolution of Evolutionary Theory. Philosophy Now 71 (Jan/Feb):6-8.
Kathia Laszlo (2003). The Evolution of Business: Learning, Innovation, and Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century. World Futures 59 (8):605 – 614.
Dr Liane M. Gabora (forthcoming). The Fate of Evolutionary Archaeology: Survival or Extinction? Philosophical Explorations.
Maureen A. O'Malley & John Dupré (2007). Towards a Philosophy of Microbiology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (4):775-779.
Maureen A. O’Malley & John Dupré (2007). Introduction: Towards a Philosophy of Microbiology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C.
Massimo Pigliucci (2006). Evolutionary Biology: Puzzle Solving or Paradigm Shifting? Quarterly Review of Biology 81 (4):377-379.
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). Microbiology and the Species Problem. Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):553-568.
Michael Ruse (1987). Is Sociobiology a New Paradigm? Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
Henri Atlan (1994). Intentionality in Nature. Against an All-Encompassing Evolutionary Paradigm: Evolutionary and Cognitive Processes Are Not Instances of the Same Process. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (1):67–87.
Stuart A. Newman (2012). What's New. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 4 (20130604).
André Ariew (1998). Are Probabilities Necessary for Evolutionary Explanations? Biology and Philosophy 13 (2):245-253.
Alain Gauthier (2013). Educating Evolutionary Co-Leadership to Embody a Radically New Development Paradigm. World Futures 69 (1):20 - 28.
Trevor Hussey (1999). Evolutionary Change and Epistemology. Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):561-584.
John Rader Platt (1970). Perception and Change. Ann Arbor,University of Michigan Press.
Maureen A. O’Malley & John Dupré (2007). Size Doesn't Matter: Towards a More Inclusive Philosophy of Biology. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):155-191.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads9 ( #223,023 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #343,026 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?