David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Research Archives 8:21-53 (1982)
Considerable scholarship over the last dozen years has greatly increased our understanding of Apology and Crito. However, the knottiest problem between these dialogues--the frequently noted apparent contradiction between Apology 29c-30c and Crito 51b-c, between Socrates’ pledge to disobey a court order to give up philosophy and his argument that legal authority absolutely obligates a citizen to obedience--is far from being resolved. In the end I argue that this contradiction is unresolved, despite numerous ingenious attempts to eliminate it, because it is rooted in deep inconsistencies in Socrates’ principles and character. In the course of reaching a conclusion that most scholars have striven to avoid I review and dispute the major strategies on resolving the contradiction: that it is only apparent, because one of the views is not (unqualifiedly) Socrates’ or a sophisticated analysis of the rhetorical purposes of the dialogues eliminates any contradiction
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ernest J. Weinrib (1982). Obedience to the Law in Plato's Crito. American Journal of Jurisprudence 27 (1):85-108.
Richard Kraut (1981). Plato's Apology and Crito: Two Recent Studies:Socrates: Philosophy in Plato's Early Dialogues. Gerasimos Xenophon Santas; Law and Obedience: The Arguments of Plato's Crito. A. D. Woozley. [REVIEW] Ethics 91 (4):651-.
Roslyn Weiss (1998). Socrates Dissatisfied: An Analysis of Plato's Crito. Oxford University Press.
Thomas C. Brickhouse (2004). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Plato and the Trial of Socrates. Routledge.
J. Dybikowski (1974). Socrates, Obedience, and the Law: Plato's Crito. Dialogue 13 (3):519-535.
Sandra Peterson (2011). Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.
Masha Marchevsky, Socrates Misinterpreted and Misapplied: An Analysis of the Constructed Contradiction Between the Apology and the Crito.
Tea Logar (2010). “Diagnostic Hedonism” and the Role of Incommensurability in Plato's Protagoras. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):241-257.
Kim (2004). A Chiastic Contradiction at Euthyphro 9e1-11b5. Phronesis 49 (3):219-224.
Christopher Moore (2011). Socratic Persuasion in the Crito. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1021 - 1046.
Lee Ward (2009). The Relation Between Politics and Philosophy in Plato's Apology of Socrates. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):501-519.
Michael L. Morgan (1991). Socrates on Trial, And: Socrates in the "Apology": An Essay on Plato's "Apology of Socrates". Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (2):297-299.
Catherine Osborne (2006). Socrates in the Platonic Dialogues. Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):1–21.
Darrel D. Colson (1989). Crito 51A-C: To What Does Socrates Owe Obedience? Phronesis 34 (1):27-55.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads12 ( #290,851 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #277,703 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?