Understanding the law: Improving legal knowledge dissemination by translating the contents of formal sources of law [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (1):51-78 (2009)
Considerable attention has been given to the accessibility of legal documents, such as legislation and case law, both in legal information retrieval (query formulation, search algorithms), in legal information dissemination practice (numerous examples of on-line access to formal sources of law), and in legal knowledge-based systems (by translating the contents of those documents to ready-to-use rule and case-based systems). However, within AI & law, it has hardly ever been tried to make the contents of sources of law, and the relations among them, more accessible to those without a legal education. This article presents a theory about translating sources of law into information accessible to persons without a legal education. It illustrates the theory by providing two elaborated examples of such translation ventures. In the first example, formal sources of law in the domain of exchanging police information are translated into rules of thumb useful for policemen. In the second example, the goal of providing non-legal professionals with insight into legislative procedures is translated into a framework for making available sources of law through an integrated legislative calendar. Although the theory itself does not support automating the several stages described, in this article some hints are given as to what such automation would have to look like.
|Keywords||Accessibility of legal information Understandability of legal information|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Stephen E. Toulmin (2003). The Uses of Argument. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Toulmin (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Gottlob Frege (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25--50.
Henry Prakken (2000). Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Studia Logica 64 (1):143-146.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laurens Mommers (2002). Applied Legal Epistemology: Building a Knowledge-Based Ontology of the Legal Domain. L. Mommers.
Jacques Savoy (1993). Searching Information in Legal Hypertext Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (3):205-232.
Anja Oskamp (1992). Model for Knowledge and Legal Expert Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (4):245-274.
Neil MacCormick (2007). Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Marie-Francine Moens (2001). Innovative Techniques for Legal Text Retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):29-57.
Jean D' Aspremont (2011). Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules. Oxford University Press.
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
James R. Maxeiner, The Rules of Law in the Reform of Legal Education: Teaching the Legal Mind in Japanese Law Schools.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #265,073 of 1,939,032 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #218,490 of 1,939,032 )
How can I increase my downloads?