David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Jon Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume 2. Oxford Univ Pr (2009)
How are inferences to design affected when one makes the (plausible) assumption that the universe is spatially infinite? I will show that arguments for the existence of God based on the improbable development of life don’t go through. I will also show that the model of design inferences promulgated by William Dembski is flawed. My model for design inferences has the (desirable) consequence that there are circumstances where a seeming miracle can count as evidence for the existence of God, even if one would expect that type of event to naturalistically occur in a spatially infinite universe
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Einar Himma (2005). The Application-Conditions for Design Inferences: Why the Design Arguments Need the Help of Other Arguments for God's Existence. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):1 - 33.
Don Lodzinski (1995). Empty Time and the Eternality of God. Religious Studies 31 (2):187 - 195.
Lewis S. Feuer (1983). Noumenalism and Einstein's Argument for the Existence of God. Inquiry 26 (3):251 – 285.
Neil A. Manson (2000). Anthropocentrism and the Design Argument. Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
William E. Morris (2008). Intelligible Design? The Philosophers' Magazine 42 (42):93-95.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #56,815 of 1,096,452 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #231,754 of 1,096,452 )
How can I increase my downloads?