God, fine-tuning, and the problem of old evidence

The fundamental constants that are involved in the laws of physics which describe our universe are finely-tuned for life, in the sense that if some of the constants had slightly different values life could not exist. Some people hold that this provides evidence for the existence of God. I will present a probabilistic version of this fine-tuning argument which is stronger than all other versions in the literature. Nevertheless, I will show that one can have reasonable opinions such that the fine-tuning argument doesn’t lead to an increase in one’s probability for the existence of God.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axl008
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Nicole Hassoun (2015). Eternally Separated Lovers: The Argument From Love. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):633-643.
M. Kotzen (2012). Selection Biases in Likelihood Arguments. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):825-839.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

275 ( #4,181 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #40,147 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.