Philosophy 74 (2):271-281 (1999)
|Abstract||A reply to Fransisco Vergara's attack on Halévy's interpretation of Bentham in Philosophy, January, 1998. Vergara had argued that Halévy was mistaken in interpreting Bentham's principle of utility as a psychological law as well as the ethical greatest happiness principle. Mongin and Sigot show that Halévy correctly interpreted Bentham's texts and that the psychological law is necessary to Bentham's legal theory, economics and politics; they also argue that it is incorrect to confuse the principle of utility with a theory of universal selfishness, and that this misunderstanding underlies Vergara's mistaken picture of both Halévy and Bentham.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Bentham (1891/2001). A Fragment on Government. Lawbook Exchange.
P. J. Kelly (1990). Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law. Oxford University Press.
J. R. Dinwiddy (1989/2004). Bentham. Oxford University Press.
Philip Schofield (2011). Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's 'Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence'. Jurisprudence 1 (2):147-167.
Jeremy Bentham (1983). The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology. Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and The Article on Utilitarianism. Clarendon Press.
David Lyons (1991). In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham's Philosophy of Utility and Law. Oxford University Press.
Philip Schofield (2009). Bentham: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York ;Continuum.
J. H. Burns (2005). Happiness and Utility: Jeremy Bentham's Equation. Utilitas 17 (1):46-61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,281 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?