Oxford University Press (2006)
|Abstract||How Doctors Think defines the nature and importance of clinical judgment. Although physicians make use of science, this book argues that medicine is not itself a science but rather an interpretive practice that relies on clinical reasoning. A physician looks at the patient's history along with the presenting physical signs and symptoms and juxtaposes these with clinical experience and empirical studies to construct a tentative account of the illness. How Doctors Think is divided into four parts. Part one introduces the concept of medicine as a practice rather than a science; part two discusses the idea of causation; part three delves into the process of forming clinical judgment; and part four considers clinical judgment within the uncertain nature of medicine itself. In How Doctors Think, Montgomery contends that assuming medicine is strictly a science can have adverse side effects, and suggests reducing these by recognizing the vital role of clinical judgment.|
|Keywords||Medicine Decision making Medicine Philosophy Clinical medicine Practice Decision Making Judgment Clinical Medicine|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$12.05 used (74% off) $23.56 new (48% off) $39.99 direct from Amazon (12% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||R723.5.M665 2006|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Malcolm Parker (2002). Whither Our Art? Clinical Wisdom and Evidence-Based Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):273-280.
James Lindemann Nelson (2007). How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 50 (4):633-636.
Norbert Paul (1998). Incurable Suffering From the “Hiatus Theoreticus”? Some Epistemological Problems in Modern Medicine and the Clinical Relevance of Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):229-251.
Peter Hucklenbroich (1998). Steps Towards a Theory of Medical Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):215-228.
Peter C. Gøtzsche (2007). Rational Diagnosis and Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Decision-Making. J. Wiley.
Hillel D. Braude (2009). Clinical Intuition Versus Statistics: Different Modes of Tacit Knowledge in Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):181-198.
L. B. McCullough (2012). Responsibly Managing Uncertainties In Clinical Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):1-5.
Thomas A. Long (1986). Narrative Unity and Clinical Judgment. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
Eugenie Gatens-Robinson (1986). Clinical Judgment and the Rationality of the Human Sciences. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (2):167-178.
James A. Marcum (2007). Montgomery, Kathryn, How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):525-530.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,817 of 722,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,783 )
How can I increase my downloads?