The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:139-149 (2000)
|Abstract||Radical skepticism, irrationalism, psychologism, and epistemological despair are popular interpretations of Hume. The theory of causal inference has been supposed to stand at the very heart of Humean skepticism, mainly because of its ‘associationism’. However, the myth of a skeptical Hume—more radical than he really is in his own admitted ‘mitigated skepticism’—has been discredited in recent years. Hume certainly was an associationist about the passions, and moral sentiments, and the rules of justice in society, and many other aspects of human life, as different as literary taste and superstition. There is plenty of evidence of this in Books II and III of the Treatise, in the second Enquiry, in the Dissertation on the Passions and in the Essays. But my main point here is that association of ideas has no cognitive role in his philosophy, beyond serving as “the cement of complex ideas.” Custom or habit do have such a cognitive role, as is well known, and shall be discussed below|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Collier (2008). Two Puzzles in Hume's Epistemology. History of Philosophy Quarterly 25:301-314.
Louis E. Loeb (2006). Psychology, Epistemology, and Skepticism in Hume's Argument About Induction. Synthese 152 (3):321 - 338.
Graciela De Pierris (2002). Causation as a Philosophical Relation in Hume. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):499 - 545.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Ira M. Schnall (2007). Hume on “Popular” and “Philosophical” Skeptical Arguments. Hume Studies 33 (1):41-66.
Amyas Merivale (2009). Hume's Mature Account of the Indirect Passions. Hume Studies 35 (1-2):185-210.
David Owen (2009). Hume and the Mechanics of Mind : Impressions, Ideas, and Association. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press.
P. J. R. Millican (ed.) (2002). Reading Hume on Human Understanding: Essays on the First Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Peter Millican (ed.) (2002). Reading Hume on Human Understanding: Essays on the First Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Lívia Guimarães (2008). Skeptical Tranquility and Hume's Manner of Death. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):115-134.
Jon Charles Miller (2012). A Treatisevs.An Enquiry: Omissions and Distortions by the New Humeans. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):1015-1026.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads3 ( #201,695 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?