David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 13 (1-4):238 – 253 (1970)
It is argued against McCloskey (1) that the restrictions on freedom of opinion which Mill is alleged to concede are not in fact departures from his general principle; (2) that Mill's infallibility argument is not quite as McCloskey interprets it, but makes the point that it is possible to have rationally grounded opinions only in a society in which free enquiry is encouraged, and that McCloskey's counter-examples fail because they presuppose such a society; (3) that Mill attaches more importance than McCloskey allows to the argument that opinions arc valueless unless rationally held and that his conception of rationality and self-development differs from McCloskey's; (4) that there is a general principle, which McCloskey has not refuted, namely that an atmosphere of free enquiry is hard to maintain, and that any suppression, even one apparently justified, will have the indirect effect of helping to destroy that atmosphere, and is consequently likely to do more harm than good.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mari Orser (1994). Pornography and the Justifiability of Restricting Freedom of Expression. Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (3):40-64.
Similar books and articles
Richard Arneson, Listed Below Are Some Examples That Mil Introduces to Help Interpret His Liberty Principle and to Illustrate its Application.
Alan Haworth (2007). On Mill, Infallibility, and Freedom of Expression. Res Publica 13 (1):77-100.
H. J. McCloskey (1983). Mill on Liberty: A Defence By John Gray London: Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1983, Xiii + 143 Pp., £8.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy 58 (226):550-.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1965). A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey. Inquiry 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
Raphael Cohen-Almagor (1997). Why Tolerate? Reflections on the Millian Truth Principle. Philosophia 25 (1-4):131-152.
H. J. McCloskey (1982). Limits to Freedom of Expression. Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1):47-58.
H. J. McCloskey (1970). Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (I). Inquiry 13 (1-4):219 – 237.
Jonathan Riley (2005). J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression. Utilitas 17 (2):147-179.
John Maloney (1994). Economic Method and Economic Rhetoric. Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):253-268.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads10 ( #345,686 of 1,911,056 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #459,551 of 1,911,056 )
How can I increase my downloads?