David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 63 (3):199–202 (2003)
Presentists believe that only presently existing things exist. In a Newtonian framework of three spatial dimensions, for example, presentists would say that all that exists is a three-dimensional spatial manifold, and the events in that manifold change with time. Eternalists, by contrast, believe that past, present, and future things all exist. In the Newtonian framework, eternalists believe in a four-dimensional space-time manifold, where events are scattered throughout this four-dimensional ‘block universe’. It is often thought that presentism is incompatible with time travel. William Godfrey-Smith (1980: 72), for example, says that ‘the metaphysical picture which underlies time travel talk is that of the block universe.’ In an informal survey of philosophers, the predominant answer to my question ‘Is presentism compatible with time travel?’ was ‘No’. Simon Keller and Michael Nelson (2001: 334) also report that this is the common view. I will argue that this common view is incorrect. Speciﬁcally, I will argue that presentism is compatible with some stories that involve closed timelike curves, and that some of these stories are time-travel stories.1 A closed timelike curve is a special case of a causal loop. A causal loop exists when there is a causal chain such that event A causes event B, event B causes event … , where the chain eventually links back to event A. Prima facie, at least, causal loops are compatible with presentism: just have all the events in the loop occur at the same time. A timelike causal connection..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Bigelow (1996). Presentism and Properties. Philosophical Perspectives 10 (Metaphysics):35-52.
David Lewis (1976). The Paradoxes of Time Travel. American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
S. Keller & M. Nelson (2001). Presentists Should Believe in Time-Travel. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):333 – 345.
Kurt Gödel (1949). An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einsteinâs Field Equations of Gravitation. Reviews of Modern Physics 21:447–450.
William Godfrey-Smith (1980). Travelling in Time: [Analysis "Problem" No. 18]. Analysis 40 (2):72 - 73.
Citations of this work BETA
Bradley Monton (2007). Time Travel Without Causal Loops. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):54-67.
Similar books and articles
John Earman, Christopher Smeenk & Christian Wüthrich (2009). Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of Time Machines? Synthese 169 (1):91 - 124.
Christian Wüthrich (2009). Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of Time Machines? Synthese 169 (1):91 - 124.
Phil Dowe (2007). Constraints on Data in Worlds with Closed Timelike Curves. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):724–735.
H. Scott Hestevold (2008). Presentism: Through Thick and Thin. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):325-347.
Steven D. Hales (2010). No Time Travel for Presentists. Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads90 ( #36,775 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)55 ( #21,080 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?