Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 37 (1):125-131 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper is a rejoinder to Thaddeus Metz’s article “Censure Theory Still Best Accounts for Punishment of the Guilty: Reply to Montague.” In his article, Metz attempts to answer objections to censure theory that I had raised previously. I argue in my rejoinder that Metz’s defense of censure theory remains seriously problematic despite what he says in his reply.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alan Norrie (1984). Thomas Hobbes and the Philosophy of Punishment. Law and Philosophy 3 (2):299 - 320.
Thaddeus Metz (2002). Realism and the Censure Theory of Punishment. In Patricia Smith & Paolo Comanducci (eds.), Legal Philosophy: General Aspects. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Thaddeus Metz (2000). Censure Theory and Intuitions About Punishment. Law and Philosophy 19 (4):491-512.
Thaddeus Metz (2006). Judging Because Understanding: A Defence of Retributive Censure. In Pedro Tabensky (ed.), Judging and Understanding: Essays on Free Will, Narrative, Meaning and the Ethical Limits of Condemnation. Ashgate.
Christopher Bennett (2006). State Denunciation of Crime. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):288-304.
Judith Lee Kissell (1999). Complicity in Thought and Language: Toleration of Wrong. Journal of Medical Humanities 20 (1):49-60.
Richard Double (1997). Misdirection on the Free Will Problem. American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3):359-68.
Greg Roebuck & David Wood (2011). A Retributive Argument Against Punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Thom Brooks (2003). Kant's Theory of Punishment. Utilitas 15 (02):206-.
Thaddeus Metz (2009). Censure Theory Still Best Accounts for Punishment of the Guilty: Reply to Montague. Philosophia 37 (1):113-23.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,328 of 740,545 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,545 )
How can I increase my downloads?