The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory

Theory and Decision 73 (3):315-355 (2012)
Judgment aggregation theory, or rather, as we conceive of it here, logical aggregation theory generalizes social choice theory by having the aggregation rule bear on judgments of all kinds instead of merely preference judgments. It derives from Kornhauser and Sager’s doctrinal paradox and List and Pettit’s discursive dilemma, two problems that we distinguish emphatically here. The current theory has developed from the discursive dilemma, rather than the doctrinal paradox, and the final objective of the paper is to give the latter its own theoretical development along the line of recent work by Dietrich and Mongin. However, the paper also aims at reviewing logical aggregation theory as such, and it covers impossibility theorems by Dietrich, Dietrich and List, Dokow and Holzman, List and Pettit, Mongin, Nehring and Puppe, Pauly and van Hees, providing a uniform logical framework in which they can be compared with each other. The review goes through three historical stages: the initial paradox and dilemma, the scattered early results on the independence axiom, and the so-called canonical theorem, a collective achievement that provided the theory with its specific method of analysis. The paper goes some way towards philosophical logic, first by briefly connecting the aggregative framework of judgment with the modern philosophy of judgment, and second by thoroughly discussing and axiomatizing the ‘general logic’ built in this framework.
Keywords Judgment aggregation  Logical aggregation  Doctrinal paradox  Discursive dilemma  General logic  Premiss-based vs. conclusion-based approach  Social choice theory  Impossibility theorems
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11238-012-9310-y
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Philippe Mongin, The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Graham Priest, Paraconsistent Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Bruce Chapman (2002). Rational Aggregation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):337-354.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

170 ( #11,858 of 1,727,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

55 ( #21,080 of 1,727,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.