Value Judgements and Value Neutrality in Economics

Economica 73 (290):257-286 (2006)
Abstract
The paper analyses economic evaluations by distinguishing evaluative statements from actual value judgments. From this basis, it compares four solutions to the value neutrality problem in economics. After rebutting the strong theses about neutrality (normative economics is illegitimate) and non-neutrality (the social sciences are value-impregnated), the paper settles the case between the weak neutrality thesis (common in welfare economics) and a novel, weak non-neutrality thesis that extends the realm of normative economics more widely than the other weak thesis does.
Keywords Value Judgment  Value Neutrality  Normative Economics  Positive Economics  Weber  Robbins
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Philippe Mongin, Value Judgements and Value Neutrality in Economics
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Roger Crisp (2007). Neutrality and Pleasure. Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):81-88.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-03-30

Total downloads

84 ( #14,272 of 1,096,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

20 ( #6,110 of 1,096,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.