David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Derrida Today 5 (2):264-282 (2012)
The last few years have seen the emergence of a more political, ‘post-Derridean’ generation, critical of the impotent messianism of the politics of deconstruction. As Žižek would have it: ‘Derrida's notion of ‘deconstruction as ethics’ seems to rely on a utopian hope which sustains the spectre of ‘infinite justice’, forever postponed, always to come’ (Žižek 2008: 225). The promise of redemption, it follows, would reside in an insubstantial promissory value, in the writing of irredeemable cheques that, if cashed in, could only ever lead to default. With its ethos of play and over-investment in an empty promise, deconstruction starts to look symptomatic of the now-bankrupt age of excess. Does the current financial crisis not entail a crisis of Derrida? This reading contrives to elide what is genuinely political in Derrida, and thereby fails to recognise the deconstruction of economic theodicy implicit in his work. Jean-Luc Nancy has argued that the concept of sacrifice is irreducibly linked to the short-circuiting of the political. We see in Derrida, however, that sacrifice is at the heart of politics, a response to undecidability that is precisely opposed to the fantasy of economics without sacrifice. Furthermore, sacrificial politics is the condition of possibility of the promise, which is constructed and contingent, rather than a priori. If there is a problem with this, it is that Derrida does not sufficiently entertain the prospect of the promise becoming so distant as to be effectively meaningless. Drawing on Bernard Stiegler, this article argues for an expansion of Derrida's account, to show not only that politics is sacrifice, but moreover that the promise of redemption cannot live on in the absence of sacrifice
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Giorgio Agamben (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.
Giorgio Agamben (2005). The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Stanford University Press.
Giorgio Agamben (2009). 'What is an Apparatus?' and Other Essays. Stanford University Press.
Alain Badiou (2006). Theoretical Writings. Continuum.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Samir Haddad (2006). Reading Derrida Reading Derrida: Deconstruction as Self-Inheritance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):505 – 520.
Martin McQuillan (ed.) (2007). The Politics of Deconstruction: Jacques Derrida and the Other of Philosophy. Pluto Press.
Saul Newman (2001). Derrida's Deconstruction of Authority. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (3):1-20.
Simon Wortham & Allison Weiner (eds.) (2007). Encountering Derrida: Legacies and Futures of Deconstruction. Continuum.
David Wills (2005). Matchbook: Essays in Deconstruction. Stanford University Press.
Adrian Costache (2011). On the Philosophical Styles of the Times: Some Questions Concerning the Meaning of Deconstruction. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):20-29.
Andrew J. McKenna (1991). Violence and Difference: Girard, Derrida, and Deconstruction. University of Illinois Press.
Joshua Kates (2008). Fielding Derrida: Philosophy, Literary Criticism, History, and the Work of Deconstruction. Fordham University Press.
Antonio Calcagno (2009). Foucault and Derrida: The Question of Empowering and Disempowering the Author. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (1):33 - 51.
Eleanor Macdonald (1999). Deconstruction's Promise: Derrida's Rethinking of Marxism. Science and Society 63 (2):145 - 172.
Gert Biesta (2009). From Critique to Deconstruction : Derrida as a Critical Philosopher. In Michael A. Peters (ed.), Derrida, Deconstruction, and the Politics of Pedagogy. Peter Lang.
Michael Thomas (2006). The Reception of Derrida: Translation and Transformation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-11
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?