Behavior and Philosophy 35:113 - 130 (2007)
|Abstract||Professor Foxall suggests the radical behaviorist language of contingencies is fine as far as it goes, and is quite suitable for matters of prediction and control. However, he argues that radical behaviorist language is extensional, and that it is necessary to formally incorporate the intentional idiom into the language of behavioral science to promote explanations and interpretations of behavior that are comprehensive in scope. Notwithstanding Professor Foxall's arguments, radical behaviorists hold that the circumstances identified by the use of the intentional idiom are accommodated by the radical behaviorist language of contingencies, not only for prediction and control but also for explanations and interpretations. Of central importance is that individuals may have histories that lead them to generate descriptions of past and present behavior, as well as descriptions of prevailing circumstances that have caused that behavior or are likely to cause that behavior in the future. The resulting verbal behavior may then enter into contingencies influencing their behavior, although the extent to which it does so varies across individuals as a function of their histories. Overall, the way that the pragmatism of radical behaviorism conceives of the nature and contribution of covert events differs appreciably from the way Professor Foxall conceives of the nature and contribution of intentional phenomena.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hugh Lacey (2007). Intentional Behaviorism and the Intentional Scheme: Comments on Gordon R. Foxall's "Intentional Behaviorism". Behavior and Philosophy 35:101 - 111.
François Tonneau (2007). Behaviorism and Chisholm's Challenge. Behavior and Philosophy 35:139 - 148.
Gordon R. Foxall (2007). Intentional Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy 35:1 - 55.
Max Hocutt (2007). Gordon Foxall on Intentional Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy 35:77 - 92.
Gordon R. Foxall (1999). The Contextual Stance. Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):25-46.
Marc N. Branch (2007). Are Foxall's Intentions Good? Behavior and Philosophy 35:61 - 64.
Howard Rachlin (2007). A Behavioral Science of Mental Life: Comments on Foxall's "Intentional Behaviorism". Behavior and Philosophy 35:131 - 138.
Peter Killeen (2007). Fuzzy Logic. Behavior and Philosophy 35:93 - 100.
José E. Burgos (2007). About Aboutness: Thoughts on Intentional Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy 35:65 - 76.
Sam Leigland (1998). Intentional Explanations and Radical Behaviorism: A Reply to Lacey. Behavior and Philosophy 26 (1/2):45 - 61.
Mecca Chiesa (1994). Radical Behaviorism: The Philosophy and the Science. Authors Cooperative.
Fred A. Keijzer (2005). Theoretical Behaviorism Meets Embodied Cognition: Two Theoretical Analyses of Behavior. Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):123-143.
Brent D. Slife, Stephen C. Yanchar & Brant Williams (1999). Conceptions of Determinism in Radical Behaviorism: A Taxonomy. Behavior and Philosophy 27 (2):75 - 96.
Ullin T. Place (1993). A Radical Behaviorist Methodology for the Empirical Investigation of Private Events. Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):25-35.
Terry L. Smith (1988). Neo-Skinnerian Psychology: A Non-Radical Behaviorism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:143 - 148.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads1 ( #291,125 of 722,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?