Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):271-271 (2004)
|Abstract||We argue that the self-experimentation espoused by Roberts as a means of generating new ideas, particularly in the area of mood, may be confounded by the experimental procedure eliciting those affective changes. We further suggest that ideas might be better generated through contact with a broad range of people, rather than in isolation.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
H. M. Malm (1989). Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum. Hypatia 4 (3):128 - 135.
Seth Roberts (2004). Self-Experimentation: Friend or Foe? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):275-287.
Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne (2010). The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments. Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Elske Straver (2007). Empathy and Propositional Knowledge. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (11):43-60.
Todd I. Lubart & Christophe Mouchiroud (2004). Why Does Self-Experimentation Lead to Creative Ideas? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):269-270.
Jane Maienschein (1986). Arguments for Experimentation in Biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:180 - 195.
Martin Voracek & Maryanne L. Fisher (2004). The Birth of a Confounded Idea: The Joys and Pitfalls of Self-Experimentation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):273-274.
Charles L. Griswold (1996). Happiness, Tranquillity, and Philosophy. Critical Review 10 (1):1-32.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,501 of 549,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )
How can I increase my downloads?