God as a communicative system Sui generis: Beyond the psychic, social, process models of the trinity
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 45 (1):105-126 (2010)
With an aim to develop a public theology for an age of information media (or media theology), this article proposes a new God-concept: God is a communicative system sui generis that autopoietically processes meaning/information in the supratemporal realm via perfect divine media ad intra (Word/Spirit). For this task, Niklas Luhmann's systems theory is critically appropriated in dialogue with theology. First, my working postmetaphysical/epistemological stance is articulated as realistic operational constructivism and functionalism. Second, a series of arguments are advanced to substantiate the thesis: (1) God is an observing system sui generis ; (2) self-referential communication is divine operation; (3) unsurpassable complexity is divine mystery; (4) supratemporal autopoiesis of meaning is divine processing; (5) agape is the symbolic medium of divine communication. Third, this communicative model of God is developed into a trinitarian theology, with a claim that this model offers a viable alternative beyond the standard (psychic, social, process) models. Finally, some implications of this model are explored for constructive theology (conceiving creation as divine mediatization) and for science-and-religion in terms of derivative models: (1) God as a living system sui generis and (2) God as a meaning system sui generis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. Baecker (2001). Why Systems? Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):59-74.
Søren Brier (2002). Intrasemiotics and Cybersemiotics. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):113-127.
F. E. Close (2010). The Void. Sterling.
Niels Henrik Gregersen (1998). The Idea of Creation and the Theory of Autopoietic Processes. Zygon 33 (3):333-367.
Charles Hartshorne (1970). Creative Synthesis and Philosophic Method. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court Pub. Co..
Citations of this work BETA
Willem B. Drees (2012). Practices, Approaches, and Agendas in Plural. Zygon 47 (2):254-255.
Young Bin Moon (2012). The Mediatized Co-Mediatizer: Anthropology in Niklas Luhmann's World. Zygon 47 (2):438-466.
Similar books and articles
Andrei A. Buckareff (2000). Divine Freedom and Creaturely Suffering in Process Theology: A Critical Appraisal. Sophia 39 (2):56-69.
Donald Wayne Viney (2007). Hartshorne's Dipolar Theism and the Mystery of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):341-350.
Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2010). Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge University Press.
Ted Peters (2007). Models of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Kathrin Glüer (2009). In Defence of a Doxastic Account of Experience. Mind and Language 24 (3):297-327.
Christopher Hughes (1989). On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas' Philosophical Theology. Cornell University Press.
Estelle Derclaye, The European Court of Justice Interprets the Database Sui Generis Right for the First Time.
Anne Warfield Rawls (1987). The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social Theory. Sociological Theory 5 (2):136-149.
Barry L. Callen (2004). Discerning the Divine: God in Christian Theology. Westminster John Knox Press.
Frank Jackson (2005). Ramsey Sentences and Avoiding the Sui Generis. In Hallvard Lillehammer & D.H. Mellor (eds.), Ramsey's Legacy (Mind Association Occasional Series). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Added to index2010-02-25
Total downloads13 ( #127,346 of 1,101,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,006 of 1,101,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?