God as a communicative system Sui generis: Beyond the psychic, social, process models of the trinity
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 45 (1):105-126 (2010)
With an aim to develop a public theology for an age of information media (or media theology), this article proposes a new God-concept: God is a communicative system sui generis that autopoietically processes meaning/information in the supratemporal realm via perfect divine media ad intra (Word/Spirit). For this task, Niklas Luhmann's systems theory is critically appropriated in dialogue with theology. First, my working postmetaphysical/epistemological stance is articulated as realistic operational constructivism and functionalism. Second, a series of arguments are advanced to substantiate the thesis: (1) God is an observing system sui generis ; (2) self-referential communication is divine operation; (3) unsurpassable complexity is divine mystery; (4) supratemporal autopoiesis of meaning is divine processing; (5) agape is the symbolic medium of divine communication. Third, this communicative model of God is developed into a trinitarian theology, with a claim that this model offers a viable alternative beyond the standard (psychic, social, process) models. Finally, some implications of this model are explored for constructive theology (conceiving creation as divine mediatization) and for science-and-religion in terms of derivative models: (1) God as a living system sui generis and (2) God as a meaning system sui generis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. Baecker (2001). Why Systems? Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):59-74.
Søren Brier (2002). Intrasemiotics and Cybersemiotics. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):113-127.
David Brown (1986). The Divine Trinity. Religious Studies 22 (1):157-161.
F. E. Close (2010). The Void. Sterling.
Niels Henrik Gregersen (1998). The Idea of Creation and the Theory of Autopoietic Processes. Zygon 33 (3):333-367.
Citations of this work BETA
Willem B. Drees (2012). Practices, Approaches, and Agendas in Plural. Zygon 47 (2):254-255.
Young Bin Moon (2012). The Mediatized Co-Mediatizer: Anthropology in Niklas Luhmann's World. Zygon 47 (2):438-466.
Similar books and articles
Andrei A. Buckareff (2000). Divine Freedom and Creaturely Suffering in Process Theology: A Critical Appraisal. Sophia 39 (2):56-69.
Barry L. Callen (2004). Discerning the Divine: God in Christian Theology. Westminster John Knox Press.
Anne Warfield Rawls (1987). The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social Theory. Sociological Theory 5 (2):136-149.
Estelle Derclaye, The European Court of Justice Interprets the Database Sui Generis Right for the First Time.
Christopher Hughes (1989). On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas' Philosophical Theology. Cornell University Press.
Kathrin Glüer (2009). In Defence of a Doxastic Account of Experience. Mind and Language 24 (3):297-327.
Ted Peters (2007). Models of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2010). Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge University Press.
Donald Wayne Viney (2007). Hartshorne's Dipolar Theism and the Mystery of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):341-350.
Frank Jackson (2005). Ramsey Sentences and Avoiding the Sui Generis. In Hallvard Lillehammer & D.H. Mellor (eds.), Ramsey's Legacy (Mind Association Occasional Series). Oxford: Clarendon Press
Added to index2010-02-25
Total downloads14 ( #170,159 of 1,700,312 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,312 )
How can I increase my downloads?