Justice within different borders: A review of Caney's global political theory [Book Review]

Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):255 – 268 (2007)
This essay examines the central claim of Caney's book, viz., that there is no reason to treat the global sphere differently from the domestic sphere. It suggests that there is much that is valuable in having relatively autonomous, differentiated political communities, which both versions of Caney's scope argument ignore. This insight is explored via a critical assessment of both versions of Caney's scope argument; version 1, which is focused on civil and political rights (and argues that that they should be universalized) and version 2, which applies to theories of distributive justice (particularly Caney's global equality of opportunity principle).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17449620701456160
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Chris Armstrong (2009). Global Egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):155-171.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

42 ( #79,152 of 1,725,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,437 of 1,725,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.