David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):255 – 268 (2007)
This essay examines the central claim of Caney's book, viz., that there is no reason to treat the global sphere differently from the domestic sphere. It suggests that there is much that is valuable in having relatively autonomous, differentiated political communities, which both versions of Caney's scope argument ignore. This insight is explored via a critical assessment of both versions of Caney's scope argument; version 1, which is focused on civil and political rights (and argues that that they should be universalized) and version 2, which applies to theories of distributive justice (particularly Caney's global equality of opportunity principle).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Chris Armstrong (2009). Global Egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):155-171.
T. Bloom (2009). Just Open Borders? Examining Joseph Carens' Open Borders Argument in the Light of a Case Study of Recent Somali Migrants to the Uk. Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):231 – 243.
Similar books and articles
Simon Caney (2011). Justice and the Duties of the Advantaged: A Defence. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):543-552.
Daniel M. Weinstock (ed.) (2007). Global Justice, Global Institutions. University of Calgary Press.
David Miller (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford University Press.
Simon Caney (2006). Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design. Social Theory and Practice 32 (4):725-756.
Simon Caney (2011). Humanity, Associations and Global Justice: A Defence of Humanity-Centred Cosmopolitan Egalitarianism. The Monist 94 (4):506-534.
Simon Caney (1998). Liberal Legitimacy, Reasonable Disagreement and Justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (3):19-36.
Carl Knight (2011). Climate Change and the Duties of the Disadvantaged: Reply to Caney. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):531-542.
Simon Caney (2007). Justice, Borders and the Cosmopolitan Ideal: A Reply to Two Critics. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):269 – 276.
Gillian Brock (2007). Caney's Global Political Theory. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):239 – 254.
Simon Caney (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #79,152 of 1,725,598 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,437 of 1,725,598 )
How can I increase my downloads?