Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):141-165 (2007)
|Abstract||Can a scientific naturalist be a mathematical realist? I review some arguments, derived largely from the writings of Penelope Maddy, for a negative answer. The rejoinder from the realist side is that the irrealist cannot explain, as well as the realist can, why a naturalist should grant the mathematician the degree of methodological autonomy that the irrealist's own arguments require. Thus a naturalist, as such, has at least as much reason to embrace mathematical realism as to embrace irrealism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Janet Folina (1994). Poincaré's Conception of the Objectivity of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 2 (3):202-227.
Jeffrey W. Roland (2007). Maddy and Mathematics: Naturalism or Not. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):423 - 450.
Michael Resnik (1995). Scientific Vs. Mathematical Realism: The Indispensability Argument. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):166-174.
J. M. Dieterle (1999). Mathematical, Astrological, and Theological Naturalism. Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):129-135.
Penelope Maddy (1990). Realism in Mathematics. Oxford University Prress.
Penelope Maddy (1995). Naturalism and Ontology. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):248-270.
James Robert Brown (2003). Kitcher's Mathematical Naturalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-20.
Penelope Maddy (1997). Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
J. L. Dowell (2004). From Metaphysical to Substantive Naturalism: A Case Study. Synthese 138 (2):149-173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,533 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?