Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):546-547 (2001)
|Abstract||Behavioral theorists such as B. F. Skinner have argued that the thesis of selection by consequences applies to behavior just as much as to morphology. This commentary specifically examines certain respects in which the thesis of “selection by consequences” applies to the development of ontogenic operant behavior.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roy A. Moxley (1996). The Import of Skinner's Three-Term Contingency. Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):145 - 167.
Bruce E. Hesse & Gary Novak (2001). On the Origins of Complexity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):540-541.
Ralph Spiga (2001). Selection: Information and Replication of the Operant. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):556-557.
David A. Eckerman & Steven M. Kemp (2001). Selection: Unexplored and Underexplored Realms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):536-537.
Todd Grantham (2001). Do Operant Behaviors Replicate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):538-539.
Claudia D. Cardinal, Matthew E. Andrzejewski & Philip N. Hineline (2000). Is the Avoiding of Operant Theory a Pavlovian Conditioned Response? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):252-253.
H. S. Pennypacker (2001). Are Theories of Selection Necessary? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):549-550.
Julian C. Leslie (2001). Selection in Operant Learning May Fit a General Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):542-543.
Rick A. Bevins (2001). Should We Essentially Ignore the Role of Stimuli in a General Account of Operant Selection? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):528-529.
François Tonneau & Michel B. C. Sokolowski (2001). Is Operant Selectionism Coherent? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):558-559.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,081 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?